Let's be honest, all intimate relationships involve an exchange of currency. What bothers some people, mostly women, is the apparent "cheap" cost of the prostitute and how it may devalue what they offer or otherwise disrupts their manipulations that rely upon a certain scarcity of sexual relations.
Its often said that women use (denial of) sex as a weapon to get what they want. When men have easy access to other partners, that certainly dulls the edge on that weapon. Women don't want laws governing how promiscous they can be. They just want laws preventing other women from undercutting them much like an existing business may push for expensive gov't regulation to prevent competition (million dollar taxi medallions in NYC for instance).
The dating ritual is about demonstrating financial resources to entice a female. The expectations a woman has about the cost of a date, the activities engaged in, etc, is a way of setting a financial barrier to prevent a man of unacceptably low economic means from dominating her attention and preventing her from finding a more economically suitable male.
Once an economically suitable male is found, the access to sex is bartered for a more long term arrangement that often includes relatively total access to a man's financial resources (including long term financial support even after the arrangement has ended). The man who visits a professional whore (Backpage bitch) is in a lot of ways paying an upfront premium to ensure the association is a temporary one time sexual encounter free of all the long term financial pitfalls relationships hold for men. In other words, we pay for overpriced pussy, so she can GO AWAY after the deed is done.
This is evidently very threatening to the woman seeking to parley her sexual favors into a long term financial windfall that could possibly support her (and possibly some other dudes kids) for many years, if not for the rest of her life.
Its often said that women use (denial of) sex as a weapon to get what they want. When men have easy access to other partners, that certainly dulls the edge on that weapon. Women don't want laws governing how promiscous they can be. They just want laws preventing other women from undercutting them much like an existing business may push for expensive gov't regulation to prevent competition (million dollar taxi medallions in NYC for instance).
The dating ritual is about demonstrating financial resources to entice a female. The expectations a woman has about the cost of a date, the activities engaged in, etc, is a way of setting a financial barrier to prevent a man of unacceptably low economic means from dominating her attention and preventing her from finding a more economically suitable male.
Once an economically suitable male is found, the access to sex is bartered for a more long term arrangement that often includes relatively total access to a man's financial resources (including long term financial support even after the arrangement has ended). The man who visits a professional whore (Backpage bitch) is in a lot of ways paying an upfront premium to ensure the association is a temporary one time sexual encounter free of all the long term financial pitfalls relationships hold for men. In other words, we pay for overpriced pussy, so she can GO AWAY after the deed is done.
This is evidently very threatening to the woman seeking to parley her sexual favors into a long term financial windfall that could possibly support her (and possibly some other dudes kids) for many years, if not for the rest of her life.